Comments on: FUD from Technology Review? http://aviflax.com/post/fud-from-technology-review/ Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:06:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Avi http://aviflax.com/post/fud-from-technology-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13767 Avi Tue, 20 May 2008 16:42:21 +0000 http://aviflax.com/?p=452#comment-13767 Jason, your comment has reminded me that my impression is almost certainly out of date; I haven't followed the magazine since before you become the Editor in Chief - I was out of the country for a year and my subscription lapsed, and I haven't since renewed. That last sentence of my post wasn't well thought-out, I'll strike it out. I'll respond to your comment at the article. Jason, your comment has reminded me that my impression is almost certainly out of date; I haven’t followed the magazine since before you become the Editor in Chief – I was out of the country for a year and my subscription lapsed, and I haven’t since renewed. That last sentence of my post wasn’t well thought-out, I’ll strike it out. I’ll respond to your comment at the article.

]]> By: Jason Pontin http://aviflax.com/post/fud-from-technology-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13766 Jason Pontin Tue, 20 May 2008 14:45:59 +0000 http://aviflax.com/?p=452#comment-13766 And I posted a response to your comment. I also reject the notion that Technology Review is "corporate." We very often write about academic research; and our mission is to cover "emerging technologies," which rarely come from corporate R&D. Jason Pontin Editor in Chief MIT's Technology Review And I posted a response to your comment. I also reject the notion that Technology Review is “corporate.” We very often write about academic research; and our mission is to cover “emerging technologies,” which rarely come from corporate R&D.

Jason Pontin
Editor in Chief
MIT’s Technology Review

]]>